A Coptic alcohol vendor was brazenly murdered as he innocently sat smoking his shisha. The killer came up from behind him, in itself a cowardice act, and slashed his throat. Arrested soon afterwards, the killer said he had warned the victim against selling alcohol, which, to him, was reason enough to perform this act of pure savagery. The victim’s family spoke in sorrow of their loss, but no vindictive act followed.
Weeks earlier a suicide bomber killed 27 Copts as they prayed in church. The assailant walked between the women’s aisles and detonated himself amidst innocent children and mothers. Egyptians, all Egyptians, mourned the dead and the injured. Still, the massacre as many others before it passed with no further reverberations.
In 2014, Mary Sameh George, driving close to a Muslim Brotherhood protest, was dragged out of her car, beaten and stabbed to death. She met this harrowing death because of a cross that was hanging from her rear-view mirror. The family and community mourned the brutality, but did not oppose God’s will, believing that Mary had gone to a better place.
As far as Libya, Copts are victimized. In February 2015, 21 Coptic Egyptian workers were beheaded in a gruesome but detailed propaganda stunt by DAESH. The men, wearing bright orange and leaning down, had their killers behead them from behind, their bodies dumped into the Mediterranean. In other circumstances this could’ve led to a fury of bitterness, but again peace and acceptance strengthened the victims’ families.
In this case, as in no other, the army vindicated the dead by carrying out an air strike early the morning after. It targeted DAESH camps and training sites. Even if Egypt had not pursued revenge, it is unlikely that Copts would’ve protested.
When radical Islamists wanted to retaliate after Rabaa Square was evacuated by force, they chose to retaliate against, first, Copts, and, later, the security apparatus. Dozens of churches, Coptic-owned businesses and homes got stormed and torched, and many Copts were attacked.
The village of Delga was a scene of total mayhem whereby the government simply lost the fight. Morsi supporters drove the police out and occupied the police station. For a period, while many Copts fled, others had to pay to be protected. A Copt was killed in his home, chained to a tractor, and dragged across the village. Priest Iskander Taous half-naked body was chained to a scooter and dragged around town, too.
Enough already: the incidents are in the thousands; we are all aware of them.
Copts throughout hardships grieve silently, smile amidst sorrow, and listen to the beckoning of their leaders who call for peace and non-violence while enduring the pain and intolerance. Retaliation as a concept does not exist amongst them, but acceptance does. Copts never once demanded much; they merely continue to live their lives accepting whatever God sends them even if it is brutal and violent.
Watch Maggie Moemen’s mother grieve, and you will understand the meaning of faith and belief. Maggie is the ten-year-old who became the 27th fatality in the church explosion. Having remained in a coma for several days, she finally succumbed to her death. Maggie’s mother, Nermine Samir, is the epitome of acceptance. She has no hatred or fury. Believing her daughter is in heaven with God, she doesn’t even ask for retribution.
Tyranny in general triggers revenge but not with Copts. When a Black young man is killed by the police force in the US, five NYC police officers are shot dead. When over 600 Muslim Brotherhood members die in Rabaa Square, Egypt suffers until today. Israelis react instantly if one of their own is harmed. Revengeful acts take place between one group and the other in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and the whole world. The world is up in arms, and yet Copts accept their fate and whatever god sends them in a stunningly peaceful fashion.
And this is why Egyptians should count their blessings and their lucky stars that Copts are who they are. Despite the horror Copts endure day in and day out, they live on deeming such horrors as something God wants for them. They are told to “…love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you. (Matt 5:44) And they follow the advice with no ifs ands or buts.
As Mahatma Ghandi and Martin Luther King had both once said, “An eye for an eye ends up making the whole world blind.”
Anyone who has subscribed to American Tutorials for Blogging and SEO is aware of the way a first sentence is designed to capture the reader and make them behave in a certain way by provoking physiological responses. So the commonly used terminology that this is “Wordspeak” (Ref: 1984 – George Orwell) used to describe many online Media, should not put you off when you see it.
(Don’t get me wrong, Wikipedia is a useful resource, and is improving rapidly by the growth in numbers of people Globally engaging with it. But on this subject, it is highly engineered).
“According to former CIA analyst Michael Scheuer, who led the CIA’s hunt for Osama bin Laden, the al-Qaeda leader was motivated by a belief that U.S. foreign policy has oppressed, killed, or otherwise harmed Muslims in the Middle East”.
What a recruitment tool! There is no getting away from the fact there is nothing wrong, or untrue about that statement. It’s there in Wikipedia as an “Intro” to Osama’s “Ideology”. And it’s deliberate. But, any human who reads it is suddenly aware of one predominant feeling. If you agree with this statement (and those that do not agree with it are in the tiny minority), you can be labelled as a “Terrorist”. It plays on your physiological responses. You suddenly feel panic and fear. You are the same as him on this. Anyone who reads it out of sheer curiosity …. the “Engineers” cannot resist:-
“We are going to scare you off and prey on your every free thought and feeling, making you feel really uncomfortable”.
A Westerner type feels instant fear and panic. A reticence to read anymore. It’s better just to not know. It’s a “Fight or Flight” response. And getting into a fight on the subject of Osama Bin Laden is deep. It’s not recommended. He’s the USA’s greatest Terrorist. It’s Osama Bin Laden! As the feeling subsides the “Victim” is left feeling vulnerable, unsure of their own judgement, confused. If this is the first trip into the world of Wars on Islam, then the task of the “Engineers” is complete. The “Victim” will just try to prove to themselves and everyone else that they are not like Osama Bin Laden, so they will adopt principles and practice them, the exact opposite principles to that one introductory sentence. Most will decide not to look again. Especially after Quote number 2. Job done.
Psychological Warfare. It also evokes in the masses of Muslims reading it for the first time – a predominant feeling of outrage. It “Incites”.
After the Iraq War of 2006, the Chilcott Enquiry exposing Bush and Blair, those who disagree with that statement are made up of the minority and the disturbed. From ignorance, bigotry, to the gene deformities at birth, leading to sections of the brain not manufacturing the right emotions and the Psychopaths not able to feel Empathy at all (a Birth Defect) – the subsection of International Society who do not agree with this statement are not normal, and the minority. What a recruitment tool! It’s “Bi- Polar” – it covers both Extremes. Those who will be sucked into supporting him, and “Conditioning” of those who absolutely will not.
Any white western non-Muslim can read that first sentence on its own, take it out of context, remove the names, remove the job title and the majority of humans would agree with it.
” Nonetheless, bin Laden criticised the U.S. for its secularform of governance, calling upon Americans to convert to Islam and “reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling, and usury“, in a letter published in late 2002. His vocal criticism of Western government and society……”
There are some sweeping statements here, not just in Osama’s statement, but in the way that what he has said is categorising such a range of issues into a nutshell of “This is what a Terrorist says and it is wrong”. He was socialised by his environment. He did not have access to the concepts of billions of people in the “West” or the differences between the Culture of the USA and Europe, etc. There was no facebook or twitter, how would he know? He was not aware that the vast majority of people globally are pretty disgusted with the US Laws on Prostitution. It is legal in so many states in the USA and is unique in that.
Pornography – the industry is something that disgusts the majority, is much more illegal in Europe than in the USA, where it is a major industry. Parading Extreme S&M Homosexuality in public in Street Festivals, in front of children. The Gay Pride Community being far from “Equal” and the USA “Shouting” about it in their usual hard sell way. Why does it have to be in public? Plenty of people are disgusted with that, the loud shouting of personal sexual behaviour. It’s considered “Impolite” in Europe and that goes for discussing Sexuality among Heterosexuals. Most of it is illegal or distasteful outside of the USA. Like TTP today, the Global Battle against the infiltration of these society breaking elements and planet killing poisons have been ongoing. Normalising what other Cultures do not consider normal. Stamping the USA all over everywhere.
Alcohol marketed and sold at cheaper than nutrition prices, to levels of Mass Alcohol Dependency, Drugs. Gambling – American style Casinos licensed in the UK quite recently – the rules and regulations regarding licensing for them are factors that are not impressing the Americans. There will be no Las Vegas Cities here, no “Climate” of addicts attracting more addicts. No hoards of Zombies sucked in by bright lights, theatre and hard sell.
As for “Usury” – the Banking System that is current today is not workable, not sustainable, and those in control know it. For 1000’s of years humans have known about the algorithm, and the area of the world it was discovered makes Finance and Economics a much more learned subject to Levantines and Semites. (Middle East). As with Mathematics, Physics, Time and Space – everything was invented 1000’s of years ago right there. On the Asian Continent. So anyone looking at Osama Bin Laden as some kind of an uneducated fanatic on everything, forget it.
So he uses different terms. He only had his own socialisation and education, he didn’t have the tools that we do today. No internet, no comparison. But it’s easy to see where the “appeal” comes from, and it’s not a great idea to categorise him in narrow terms. The more they vilify Osama Bin Laden, the more recruits he will get, and that is exactly what they want. Now there are others in control, and they are moving the masses of Al-Qaeda in direct Opposition to Osama’s principles. Al Qaeda has become Zionist Sock Puppets. Willingly, corrupt in some cases, and unwittingly in others. Thousands of people recruited from 181 Countries to Syria, on the myth, legend, infamy of Osama Bin Laden, to join Battalions lead by the US, UK and Israelis. They didn’t know until they got there, most of them. And when they did, then masses of them erupted into End Times Mentality, and it’s easy to see why. Add the gross misuse of giving them all Capatone “to fight harder” and they become victims too – Drug Addicts for starters, high strength Amphetamine Sulphate. 1000’s of Al-Qaeda and Daesh are now addicted to it, with no idea that their feelings are as a result of that. No education on it at all, in fact.
They had Social Media for 2 years in some cases. Whereas in the West we’d had it since 2006. Muslims do not lie so much, as a rule, so they cannot see it coming. The manipulation and the growth of Al-Qaeda to armies of tens of thousands – forming Daesh, has been the largest ‘Social Experiment’ ever conducted by an Entity. And that “Entity” is the NSA. So many millions of us have watched it in real-time, happening in Social Media Groups that had nothing to do with al-Qaeda and Daesh, and saw fake social media Profiles recruiting them. And guess what, it was all done with a massive pack of lies at worst, and subtle manipulation at best. It beggars belief that the Zionists ever thought they could get away with it. Within months enough Evidence was gathered to enable Judicial Watch to get a Case together to Prosecute the CIA and get the Proof. (www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/pgs-287-293-291-jw-v-dod-and-state-14-812-2/ ) To continue to view it happening, on social media – you had to put up with Psychological Abuse and Warfare on a level you could never imagine.
That, is I think, the first time in history that Non-Muslims from across the World got a real taste of what it is like to be in the Target of the Psychopaths. Because that is what they are. It’s like having thousands of Horror Movie Script Characters attacking you – but it’s not a film. They are for real. And if the USA/UK etc., thinks that is progressive, sustainable and not degrading (to themselves), then I keep coming back to the same point. “Self Isolating” and “Self Destructive”. And as Osama Bin Laden was working under direct Command of the US Military in the 1980’s – I decided to take another look at him, and really delve, always in the back of my mind that once he was conscripted into US Military Ranks in that War, those Psychopaths would never let go of him. He could either be a “Yes” man or suffer the consequences.
As for us, and anyone else reading this that is put off joining in the Truth hunt, there are over a billion of us, growing in number every day, mingled across every continent, every society. What can anyone do about that? Apart from taking the Internet down, absolutely nothing. So don’t worry, get involved.
‘Abd Allah ibn Wahb al-Rasibi (d. 659) was a Kharijite leader who was known for his bravery and piety. He died in the battle of Nahrawan.
When ‘Uthman ibn ‘Affan was elected to be the third caliph in 644, some leaders of the Muslim community were happy while others were not. The former were the clan of Umayyah, the house of ‘Uthman; the latter were the clan of Hashim, house of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, the losing caliphal candidate. The expectations of the Umayyah clan were met. The caliph appointed a number of the governors of the provinces from his clan, and thus invited the envy of others and the charge of nepotism from some. Soon the anti-’Uthman forces gathered strength and assassinated the caliph in 656. The same body that elected ‘Uthman to the caliphate then elected ‘Ali to replace him. The Umayyah clan was furious. Mu’awiya ibn Abu Sufyan, governor of Syria, and ‘Amri ibn al-’As, governor of Egypt, both of the Umayyah clan, united and asked ‘Ali to identify and punish the assassins, or he would be disqualified from the caliphate by implication. Much as he personally might have wished to comply with the request. ‘Ali was too weak to do so because insurrections were breaking out in many regions of the realm. Hence, Mu’awiya and ‘Amr joined forces and declared their independence of ‘Ali’s caliphate. Their contest for power soon became open defiance.
When their respective armies confronted each other at Siffin in 657, and the forces of ‘Ali were about to carry the day, ‘Ali’s opponents resorted to a ruse and offered to accept arbitration. Anxious to avoid further bloodshed and exhausted, ‘Ali accepted the offer and withdrew. The offer of arbitration was a hoax and Mu’awiya regrouped his forces for another round. The arbitration took place in 659 at Adhruh on the caravan route from Medina to Damascus, between Ma’an and Petra.
A group of ‘Ali’s followers strongly disagreed with the arbitration. They claimed that ‘Ali had betrayed Islam by agreeing to the truce and should have referred judgment to the Qur’an alone. They also claimed that all Muslims were equal and that no one should rule over another. In this way, they denounced both ‘Ali and Mu’awiya and said that their belief as La Hukma Illa Lillah, meaning “No Rulership except by Allah alone.” These dissenters insisted that arms should settle the issue. They were led by ‘Abd Allah ibn Wahb al-Rasibi and counted several thousand soldiers.
‘Ali had to confront these dissenters to prevent an upset of the arrangement with Mu’awiya and to remain caliph. There was some reluctance in the army of ‘Ali to fight the dissenters because they had been with ‘Ali when ‘Ali fought Mu’awiya at Siffin. ‘Ali also did not want to fight the dissenters and offered amnesty to those who agreed to come under his banner. All but 1800 of the dissenters left ‘Abd Allah ibn Wahb al-Rasibi.
At the Battle of Nahrawan, the dissenters attacked ‘Ali with desperate courage. However, they did not stand a chance against the superior forces of ‘Ali, and all but nine of them were killed. Among the dead was ‘Abd Allah ibn Wahb al-Rasibi. As for the surviving dissenters, the nine managed to flee to Basra and elsewhere, where they spread the fire of their hatred and recruited more followers. ‘Ali’s army suffered on eight casualties, but the biggest ultimate casualty was ‘Ali himself.
Two years after the Battle of Nahrawan, the dissenters sent out three assassins to kill ‘Ali, Mu’awiya and Amr al-As. The latter two survived but ‘Ali was assassinated at the hand of ‘Abdul Rahman ibn Muljam in the mosque of Kufa.
The dissenters — the opponents of the arbitration with Mu’awiya — were expelled from the ranks of ‘Ali’s followers and declared heretics. They were charged with going against the consensus of the umma and were given the name Khawarij or seceders. Subsequently, the Khawarij — the Kharijites — were fought by everybody.
Alternative names include:
‘Abd Allah ibn Wahb al-Rasibi
‘Abdallah ibn Wahb al-Rasibi
‘Abdullah ibn Wahb al-Rasibi
Ibn Wahb al-Rasibi, ‘Abd Allah
Ibn Wahb al-Rasibi, ‘Abdallah
Ibn Wahb al-Rasibi, ‘Abdullah